Robust Market Making: To Quote, or not To Quote
Ziyi Wang, Carmine Ventre, Maria Polukarov

TL;DR
This paper extends adversarial reinforcement learning for market making by allowing agents to occasionally abstain from quoting, which improves trading performance and flexibility in various market conditions.
Contribution
It introduces new market making agents with richer action spaces that include abstaining from quoting, enhancing robustness and compliance with market rules.
Findings
Occasional refusal to quote improves returns.
Agents can meet high quoting ratios up to 99.9%.
Enhanced strategies outperform continuous quoting in adversarial environments.
Abstract
Market making is a popular trading strategy, which aims to generate profit from the spread between the quotes posted at either side of the market. It has been shown that training market makers (MMs) with adversarial reinforcement learning allows to overcome the risks due to changing market conditions and to lead to robust performances. Prior work assumes, however, that MMs keep quoting throughout the trading process, but in practice this is not required, even for ``registered'' MMs (that only need to satisfy quoting ratios defined by the market rules). In this paper, we build on this line of work and enrich the strategy space of the MM by allowing to occasionally not quote or provide single-sided quotes. Towards this end, in addition to the MM agents that provide continuous bid-ask quotes, we have designed two new agents with increasingly richer action spaces. The first has the option…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
