Inaccuracy of Ensemble-Based Covariance Propagation, Beyond Sampling Error
Shay Gilpin

TL;DR
This paper reveals that ensemble-based covariance propagation in data assimilation can be highly inaccurate when correlation lengths are near grid resolution, due to fundamental discrepancies with continuum covariance dynamics, beyond sampling errors.
Contribution
It demonstrates through experiments and analysis that ensemble covariance propagation can be fundamentally inaccurate, challenging assumptions in current data assimilation practices.
Findings
Ensemble covariances can be significantly inaccurate near grid scale.
Errors in covariance propagation are beyond sampling errors and cannot be fixed by standard methods.
Discrete covariance dynamics can differ fundamentally from continuum covariance dynamics.
Abstract
Modern data assimilation schemes typically use the same discrete dynamical model to evolve the state estimate in time also to approximate the evolution, or propagation, of the estimation error covariance. Ensemble-based methods, such as the ensemble Kalman filter, approximate the evolution of the covariance through the propagation of individual ensemble members. Thus, it is tacitly assumed that if the discrete state propagation and resulting mean state estimates are accurate, then the ensemble-based discrete covariance propagation will be accurate as well, apart from sampling errors due to limited ensemble size. Through a series of numerical experiments supported by analytical results, we demonstrate that this assumption is false when correlation length scales approach grid resolution. We show for states that satisfy advective dynamics, that while the discrete state propagation and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
