Above 99.9% Fidelity Single-Qubit Gates, Two-Qubit Gates, and Readout in a Single Superconducting Quantum Device
Fabian Marxer, Jakub Mro\.zek, Joona Andersson, Leonid Abdurakhimov, Janos Adam, Ville Bergholm, Rohit Beriwal, Chun Fai Chan, Saga Dahl, Soumya Ranjan Das, Frank Deppe, Olexiy Fedorets, Zheming Gao, Alejandro Gomez Frieiro, Daria Gusenkova, Andrew Guthrie, Tuukka Hiltunen

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates a superconducting quantum device achieving over 99.9% fidelity in single-qubit gates, two-qubit gates, and readout simultaneously, advancing scalable quantum computing.
Contribution
It introduces a method to optimize coupling parameters in a superconducting circuit for high-fidelity operations without trade-offs, including a new calibration protocol.
Findings
Achieved 99.93% average CZ gate fidelity
Achieved 99.98% single-qubit gate fidelity
Readout fidelities over 99.94%
Abstract
Achieving high-fidelity single-qubit gates, two-qubit gates, and qubit readout is critical for building scalable, error-corrected quantum computers. However, device parameters that enhance one operation often degrade the others, making simultaneous optimization challenging. Here, we demonstrate that careful tuning of qubit-coupler coupling strengths in a superconducting circuit with two transmon qubits coupled via a tunable coupler enables high-fidelity single- and two-qubit gates, without compromising readout performance. As a result, we achieve a 40h-averaged CZ gate fidelity of 99.93%, simultaneous single-qubit gate fidelities of 99.98%, and readout fidelities over 99.94% in a single device. These results are enabled by optimized coupling parameters, an efficient CZ gate calibration experiment based on our new Phased-Averaged Leakage Error Amplification (PALEA) protocol, and a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
