The next question after Turing's question: Introducing the Grow-AI test
Alexandru Tugui

TL;DR
The paper introduces GROW-AI, a comprehensive framework for assessing AI maturity by evaluating growth through multi-arena games, expert weighting, and a standardized journal, aiming to measure AI development beyond traditional tests.
Contribution
It presents the GROW-AI framework, a novel multi-criteria, multi-arena assessment method that evaluates AI growth and maturity, integrating psychological, robotic, computational, and ethical perspectives.
Findings
Method provides coherent, comparable AI maturity scores.
Multi-game structure reveals strengths and vulnerabilities.
Standardized journal ensures traceability and replicability.
Abstract
This study aims to extend the framework for assessing artificial intelligence, called GROW-AI (Growth and Realization of Autonomous Wisdom), designed to answer the question "Can machines grow up?" -- a natural successor to the Turing Test. The methodology applied is based on a system of six primary criteria (C1-C6), each assessed through a specific "game", divided into four arenas that explore both the human dimension and its transposition into AI. All decisions and actions of the entity are recorded in a standardized AI Journal, the primary source for calculating composite scores. The assessment uses the prior expert method to establish initial weights, and the global score -- Grow Up Index -- is calculated as the arithmetic mean of the six scores, with interpretation on maturity thresholds. The results show that the methodology allows for a coherent and comparable assessment of the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
