Validating Terrain Models in Digital Twins for Trustworthy sUAS Operations
Arturo Miguel Russell Bernal, Maureen Petterson, Pedro Antonio Alarcon Granadeno, Michael Murphy, James Mason, Jane Cleland-Huang

TL;DR
This paper presents a comprehensive validation process for terrain models in Environmental Digital Twins, crucial for safe and reliable sUAS operations in complex environments, addressing real-world uncertainties and sensor inaccuracies.
Contribution
It introduces a 3-Dimensional validation workflow for terrain models in Digital Twins, integrating software engineering principles with real-world testing for sUAS applications.
Findings
Validated terrain models improve sUAS safety in complex environments
The workflow effectively identifies model inaccuracies and sensor errors
Demonstrated approach enhances trustworthiness of digital twin components
Abstract
With the increasing deployment of small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (sUAS) in unfamiliar and complex environments, Environmental Digital Twins (EDT) that comprise weather, airspace, and terrain data are critical for safe flight planning and for maintaining appropriate altitudes during search and surveillance operations. With the expansion of sUAS capabilities through edge and cloud computing, accurate EDT are also vital for advanced sUAS capabilities, like geolocation. However, real-world sUAS deployment introduces significant sources of uncertainty, necessitating a robust validation process for EDT components. This paper focuses on the validation of terrain models, one of the key components of an EDT, for real-world sUAS tasks. These models are constructed by fusing U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) datasets and satellite imagery, incorporating high-resolution environmental data to support…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
