Embarrassed to observe: The effects of directive language in brand conversation
Andria Andriuzzi, G\'eraldine Michel

TL;DR
This study reveals that directive language used by brands in social media conversations can negatively impact consumer engagement due to perceived face-threatening behavior, especially in nonproduct contexts, but strong brand relationships can mitigate this effect.
Contribution
It provides new insights into how directive language affects consumer perception and engagement in social media, emphasizing the role of context and brand relationship strength.
Findings
Directive language can cause vicarious embarrassment among observers.
Nonproduct conversations amplify the negative effects of directive language.
Strong brand relationships lessen the adverse impact of directive language.
Abstract
In social media, marketers attempt to influence consumers by using directive language, that is, expressions designed to get consumers to take action. While the literature has shown that directive messages in advertising have mixed results for recipients, we know little about the effects of directive brand language on consumers who see brands interacting with other consumers in social media conversations. On the basis of a field study and three online experiments, this study shows that directive language in brand conversation has a detrimental downstream effect on engagement of consumers who observe such exchanges. Specifically, in line with Goffman's facework theory, because a brand that encourages consumers to react could be perceived as face-threatening, consumers who see a brand interacting with others in a directive way may feel vicarious embarrassment and engage less (compared with…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
