TL;DR
This paper investigates the systematic biases of large language models towards different data formats, analyzing their causes, internal mechanisms, and proposing interventions to improve fairness and robustness in heterogeneous data processing.
Contribution
It provides the first comprehensive empirical analysis of format bias in LLMs, identifying key factors and internal attention mechanisms influencing bias, and suggests practical strategies for mitigation.
Findings
Format bias is consistent across model types.
Bias is driven by information richness, structure quality, and representation.
Attention imbalance correlates with format bias.
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly employed in applications that require processing information from heterogeneous formats, including texts, tables, infoboxes, and knowledge graphs. However, systematic biases toward particular formats may undermine LLMs' ability to integrate heterogeneous data impartially, potentially resulting in reasoning errors and increased risks in downstream tasks. Yet it remains unclear whether such biases are systematic, which data-level factors drive them, and what internal mechanisms underlie their emergence. In this paper, we present the first comprehensive study of format bias in LLMs through a three-stage empirical analysis. The first stage explores the presence and direction of bias across a diverse range of LLMs. The second stage examines how key data-level factors influence these biases. The third stage analyzes how format bias emerges…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
