Incorporating device characterization into security proofs
Ernest Y.-Z. Tan, Shlok Nahar

TL;DR
This paper develops a rigorous framework for incorporating device characterization into security proofs for quantum key distribution, ensuring practical deployment with certified device parameters.
Contribution
It introduces a formal approach to integrate device certification procedures into QKD security proofs, clarifying valid conclusions and addressing misconceptions.
Findings
Framework for analyzing device characterization procedures
Requirements for security proofs and certification methods
Discussion on connections to composable security
Abstract
Typical security proofs for quantum key distribution (QKD) rely on having some model for the devices, with the security guarantees implicitly relying on the values of various parameters of the model, such as dark count rates or detector efficiencies. Hence to deploy QKD in practice, we must establish how to certify or characterize the model parameters of a manufacturer's QKD devices. We present a rigorous framework for analyzing such procedures, laying out concrete requirements for both the security proofs and the certification or characterization procedures. In doing so, we describe various forms of conclusions that can and cannot be validly drawn from such procedures, addressing some potential misconceptions. We also discuss connections to composable security frameworks and some technical aspects that remain to be resolved in that direction.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Information and Cryptography · Quantum Mechanics and Applications · Physical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) and Hardware Security
