Smart Charging Impact Analysis using Clustering Methods and Real-world Distribution Feeders
Ravi Raj Shrestha, Zhi Zhou, Limon Barua, Nazib Siddique, Karthikeyan Balasubramaniam, Yan Zhou, Lusha Wang

TL;DR
This paper evaluates how smart charging strategies like TOU and Load Balancing can mitigate EV impact on power distribution networks, reducing upgrade costs and maintaining reliability through analysis of real-world feeders.
Contribution
It compares the effectiveness of TOU and Load Balancing strategies on real feeders using clustering and load flow analysis, highlighting cost savings and performance benefits.
Findings
Both strategies reduce infrastructure upgrade needs.
Load Balancing outperforms TOU at high customer enrollment.
Smart charging supports EV integration with minimal network upgrades.
Abstract
The anticipated widespread adoption of electric vehicles (EVs) necessitates a critical evaluation of existing power distribution infrastructures, as EV integration imposes additional stress on distribution networks that can lead to component overloading and power quality degradation. Implementing smart charging mechanisms can mitigate these adverse effects and defer or even avoid upgrades. This study assesses the performance of two smart charging strategies - Time of Use (TOU) pricing and Load Balancing (LB) on seven representative real-world feeders identified using k-means clustering. A time series-based steady-state load flow analysis was conducted on these feeders to simulate the impact of EV charging under both strategies across four different EV enrollment scenarios and three representative days to capture seasonal load characteristics. A grid upgrade strategy has been proposed to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
