Hierarchical Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Time-Resolved NMR Data
Lennart H. Bosch, Pernille R. Jensen, Nico Striegler, Thomas Unden, Jochen Scharpf, Usman Qureshi, Philipp Neumann, Martin Gierse, John W. Blanchard, Stephan Knecht, Jochen Scheuer, Ilai Schwartz, Martin B. Plenio

TL;DR
This paper introduces a Bayesian hierarchical maximum likelihood estimation method for time-resolved NMR data, improving accuracy and uncertainty propagation over traditional two-stage procedures.
Contribution
It develops a novel hierarchical Bayesian approach that reduces to a least-squares problem, enhancing estimation precision in multidimensional NMR data analysis.
Findings
Improved metabolite concentration estimates over Fourier methods.
Demonstrated advantages in high-field and nanoscale NMR setups.
Applicable to other time-resolved spectroscopy data analysis.
Abstract
Metabolic monitoring and reaction rate estimation using hyperpolarized NMR technology requires accurate quantitative analysis of multidimensional data scenarios. Currently, this analysis is often performed in a two-stage procedure, which is prone to errors in uncertainty propagation and estimation. We propose an approach derived from a Bayesian hierarchical model that intrinsically propagates uncertainties and operates on the full data to maximize the precision at minimal uncertainty. In an analytic treatment, we reduce the estimation procedure to a least-squares optimization problem which can be understood as an extension of the Variable Projection (VarPro) approach for data scenarios with two predictors. We investigate the method's efficacy in two experiments with hyperpolarized metabolites recorded with conventional high-field NMR devices and a micronscale NMR setup using…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
