A Guide to Stakeholder Analysis for Cybersecurity Researchers
James C Davis, Sophie Chen, Huiyun Peng, Paschal C Amusuo, Kelechi G Kalu

TL;DR
This paper provides practical guidance for cybersecurity researchers on conducting stakeholder analysis to meet ethics requirements, including stakeholder identification, mapping to research methods, and real-world examples.
Contribution
It introduces a structured approach to stakeholder analysis in cybersecurity research, linking stakeholder types to empirical methods and offering illustrative examples.
Findings
Stakeholder types can be systematically identified in cybersecurity research.
Mapping stakeholders to research methods clarifies ethical analysis processes.
Worked examples demonstrate practical application in real projects.
Abstract
Stakeholder-based ethics analysis is now a formal requirement for submissions to top cybersecurity research venues. This requirement reflects a growing consensus that cybersecurity researchers must go beyond providing capabilities to anticipating and mitigating the potential harms thereof. However, many cybersecurity researchers may be uncertain about how to proceed in an ethics analysis. In this guide, we provide practical support for that requirement by enumerating stakeholder types and mapping them to common empirical research methods. We also offer worked examples to demonstrate how researchers can identify likely stakeholder exposures in real-world projects. Our goal is to help research teams meet new ethics mandates with confidence and clarity, not confusion.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsInformation and Cyber Security
