Mathematical proof concerning the additivity problem of nonlinear normalized citation counts
Xing Wang, Zhihui Zhang

TL;DR
This paper provides rigorous mathematical proofs demonstrating that nonlinear normalized citation counts cannot be added due to their non-equidistant nature, impacting the theoretical foundation of scientometric data normalization.
Contribution
It establishes that nonlinear normalization methods must be non-equidistant transformations, which are not additive, offering a fundamental theoretical insight into citation data processing.
Findings
Nonlinear normalized citation counts are non-equidistant.
Such counts cannot be summed mathematically.
The proofs apply broadly to various data transformations.
Abstract
The issue of whether nonlinear normalized citation counts can be added is critically important in scientometrics because it touches upon the theoretical foundation of underlying computation in the field. In this paper, we provide rigorous mathematical proofs for the key theorems underlying this fundamental issue. Based on these proofs, we ultimately arrive at the following conclusion: a nonlinear normalization method for citation counts must be a non-equidistant transformation; consequently, the resulting nonlinear normalized citation counts are no longer equidistant and therefore cannot be added. Furthermore, because our mathematical proofs are established over the real number domain, we also derive a more general conclusion that is applicable to data transformations over the real number domain across various scientific fields: a nonlinear transformation becomes a non-equidistant…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputational Drug Discovery Methods
