Explaining Hitori Puzzles: Neurosymbolic Proof Staging for Sequential Decisions
Maria Leonor Pacheco, Fabio Somenzi, Dananjay Srinivas, Ashutosh Trivedi

TL;DR
This paper introduces a neurosymbolic method combining decision procedures and Large Language Models to explain complex decision sequences, demonstrated through solving and explaining Hitori puzzles.
Contribution
It presents a novel neurosymbolic approach that integrates SAT solvers and LLMs for explaining puzzle solutions, with a practical tool and experimental validation.
Findings
Effective explanations for Hitori puzzle solutions
Successful integration of symbolic and neural methods
Tool assists humans in puzzle solving
Abstract
We propose a neurosymbolic approach to the explanation of complex sequences of decisions that combines the strengths of decision procedures and Large Language Models (LLMs). We demonstrate this approach by producing explanations for the solutions of Hitori puzzles. The rules of Hitori include local constraints that are effectively explained by short resolution proofs. However, they also include a connectivity constraint that is more suitable for visual explanations. Hence, Hitori provides an excellent testing ground for a flexible combination of SAT solvers and LLMs. We have implemented a tool that assists humans in solving Hitori puzzles, and we present experimental evidence of its effectiveness.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics
