Microrheology with rotational Brownian motion
Yasuya Nakayama

TL;DR
This study validates rotational microrheology for measuring the dynamic modulus of viscoelastic fluids using DNS, comparing inertialess and full RMR methods, and clarifies their applicability limits across frequency regimes.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of the accuracy and limitations of inertialess and full RMR methods through DNS, clarifying their valid frequency ranges and insensitivity to boundary conditions.
Findings
Inertialess RMR accurately estimates G* at low frequencies.
Full RMR improves G* estimation up to a certain high frequency.
Rotational Brownian motion is insensitive to periodic boundary conditions.
Abstract
Passive rotational microrheology (RMR) for evaluating the dynamic modulus \(G^*\) of a suspending fluid through the rotational Brownian motion of a spherical probe particle is validated using direct numerical simulations (DNS) of Brownian motion in a viscoelastic fluid. Two methods of RMR are compared: an inertialess RMR based on the Generalized Stokes--Einstein relation for rotational diffusion (RGSER) and the full RMR based on the generalized Langevin equation for rotation, which accounts for fluid and particle inertia. Our analysis, performed using DNS of the fluctuating Oldroyd-B fluid, reveals that inertialess RMR accurately estimates \(G^*\) for \(\omega\lambda \alt 1\), but deviates significantly at high frequencies. In contrast, the full RMR improves \(G^*\) estimation accuracy up to the frequency \(\omega \approx \tau_{s}^{-1}=\eta_{s}/\rho_{f}a^{2}\), where fluid inertia…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
