The effect of poloidal magnetic field and helicity injection on a breakout CME
Nitin Vashishtha, Vaibhav Pant, Dana-Camelia Talpeanu, Dipankar Banerjee, and Shantanu Rastogi

TL;DR
This study uses 2.5D MHD simulations to explore how background magnetic fields and helicity injection influence CME initiation, revealing that stronger poloidal fields suppress eruptions and helicity growth rate is key to eruption likelihood.
Contribution
It introduces a numerical simulation approach to analyze the impact of background magnetic fields and helicity injection on CME eruptions within the breakout model.
Findings
Stronger background poloidal magnetic fields constrain CME eruptions.
Growth rate of net current helicity determines eruption likelihood.
Different magnetic scenarios show varied CME eruption outcomes.
Abstract
Coronal mass ejections (CMEs), as crucial drivers of space weather, necessitate a comprehensive understanding of their initiation and evolution in the solar corona, in order to better predict their propagation. Solar Cycle 24 exhibited lower sunspot numbers compared to Solar Cycle 23, along with a decrease in the heliospheric magnetic pressure. Consequently, a higher frequency of weak CMEs was observed during Solar Cycle 24. Forecasting CMEs is vital, and various methods, primarily involving the study of the global magnetic parameters using datasets like Space-weather Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager Active Region Patches (SHARP), have been employed in earlier works. In this study, we perform numerical simulations of CMEs within a magnetohydrodynamics framework using Message Passing Interface - Adaptive Mesh Refinement Versatile Advection Code (MPI-AMRVAC) in 2.5 dimensions. By…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
