Examining the Impact of Tutorial Activity Engagement on Undergraduate Students' Collaborative Preferences
Sang Hyun Kim, Tanya Evans

TL;DR
This study investigates how tutorial engagement influences undergraduate students' preferences for collaborative learning in mathematics, revealing that increased collaboration correlates with stronger preferences, which remain stable over time.
Contribution
It provides empirical evidence on the stable relationship between tutorial engagement and collaborative preferences in a tertiary mathematics context.
Findings
Higher collaborative engagement leads to stronger CPLM.
CPLM preferences remain stable over a semester.
Familiar tutorial modes reinforce existing collaboration preferences.
Abstract
This study examines the impact of tutorial engagement on Collaborative Preferences for Learning Mathematics (CPLM) in a tertiary context. A two-way mixed ANOVA analysed these preferences over a semester in a sample of undergraduate students. As expected, collaborative engagement had a significant main effect, with students who collaborated more reporting stronger preferences for working with their peers (higher CPLM). The absence of an interaction effect between the nature of tutorial engagement and time suggests CPLM differences remain stable. This may indicate that familiar modes of tutorial engagement may reinforce existing collaboration preferences.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
