A sharp lower bound for the number of phylogenetic trees displayed by a tree-child network
Charles Semple, Kristina Wicke

TL;DR
This paper establishes new lower bounds on the number of phylogenetic trees displayed by tree-child networks with no underlying 3-cycles, providing sharp bounds and characterizations.
Contribution
It introduces the first sharp lower bounds for the number of displayed trees in tree-child networks without 3-cycles, extending known results for normal networks.
Findings
Lower bound of 2^{k/2} trees for even k
Lower bound of (3/2√2)2^{k/2} trees for odd k
Characterization of networks attaining these bounds
Abstract
A normal (phylogenetic) network with reticulations displays phylogenetic trees. In this paper, we establish an analogous result for tree-child (phylogenetic) networks with no underlying -cycles. In particular, we show that a tree-child network with reticulations and no underlying -cycles displays at least phylogenetic trees if is even and at least if is odd. Moreover, we show that these bounds are sharp and characterise the tree-child networks that attain these bounds.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
