Data Work in Memory Institutions: Why and How Information Professionals Use Wikidata
Riya Sinha, Amelia Acker, Hanlin Li

TL;DR
This study explores why and how information professionals in memory institutions use Wikidata, highlighting their roles, motivations, practices, and opportunities for enhanced collaboration and support within the Wikidata community.
Contribution
It provides new insights into the institutional motivations and practices of memory organizations using Wikidata, emphasizing their unique roles and the importance of supporting their data work.
Findings
Identified three archetypal roles: providers, acquirers, and mutualists.
Highlighted the value of data contributions by memory institutions.
Discussed collaboration opportunities between institutions and volunteers.
Abstract
Wikidata, an open structured database and a sibling project to Wikipedia, has recently become an important platform for information professionals to share structured metadata from their memory institutions, organizations that maintain public knowledge and cultural heritage materials. While studies have investigated why and how peer producers contribute to Wikidata, the institutional motivations and practices of these organizations are less understood. Given Wikidata's potential role in linking and supporting knowledge infrastructures and open data systems, we examined why and how information professionals in memory institutions use Wikidata as part of their organizational workflow. Through interviews with 15 participants, we identified the three archetypal roles of Wikidata users within memory institutions, providers, acquirers, and mutualists, and the different types of contributions…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
