Stands to Reason: Investigating the Effect of Reasoning on Idiomaticity Detection
Dylan Phelps, Rodrigo Wilkens, Edward Gow-Smith, Thomas Pickard, Maggie Mi, Aline Villavicencio

TL;DR
This study investigates how reasoning capabilities in large language models influence idiomaticity detection, revealing that larger models benefit modestly from reasoning, while smaller models can improve with explicit definitions in prompts.
Contribution
It provides an empirical analysis of reasoning's impact on idiomaticity detection across different model sizes and explores prompt-based improvements for smaller models.
Findings
Larger models show better understanding of idiomatic expressions.
Chain-of-thought reasoning yields modest performance gains in larger models.
Providing definitions in prompts can improve smaller models' performance.
Abstract
The recent trend towards utilisation of reasoning models has improved the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) across many tasks which involve logical steps. One linguistic task that could benefit from this framing is idiomaticity detection, as a potentially idiomatic expression must first be understood before it can be disambiguated and serves as a basis for reasoning. In this paper, we explore how reasoning capabilities in LLMs affect idiomaticity detection performance and examine the effect of model size. We evaluate, as open source representative models, the suite of DeepSeek-R1 distillation models ranging from 1.5B to 70B parameters across four idiomaticity detection datasets. We find the effect of reasoning to be smaller and more varied than expected. For smaller models, producing chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning increases performance from Math-tuned intermediate models,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
