Towards Human-AI Complementarity in Matching Tasks
Adrian Arnaiz-Rodriguez, Nina Corvelo Benz, Suhas Thejaswi, Nuria Oliver, Manuel Gomez-Rodriguez

TL;DR
This paper introduces comatch, a collaborative matching system that optimally combines human judgment and algorithmic confidence to improve decision quality in high-stakes matching tasks, validated through extensive human studies.
Contribution
It proposes a novel collaborative approach that defers decisions to humans or algorithms based on confidence, enhancing matching outcomes beyond existing systems.
Findings
Comatch outperforms human-only and algorithm-only matching in experiments.
The system effectively balances decision delegation to maximize performance.
Large-scale human study validates the approach's effectiveness.
Abstract
Data-driven algorithmic matching systems promise to help human decision makers make better matching decisions in a wide variety of high-stakes application domains, such as healthcare and social service provision. However, existing systems are not designed to achieve human-AI complementarity: decisions made by a human using an algorithmic matching system are not necessarily better than those made by the human or by the algorithm alone. Our work aims to address this gap. To this end, we propose collaborative matching (comatch), a data-driven algorithmic matching system that takes a collaborative approach: rather than making all the matching decisions for a matching task like existing systems, it selects only the decisions that it is the most confident in, deferring the rest to the human decision maker. In the process, comatch optimizes how many decisions it makes and how many it defers to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
