Beyond Internal Data: Bounding and Estimating Fairness from Incomplete Data
Varsha Ramineni, Hossein A. Rahmani, Emine Yilmaz, David Barber

TL;DR
This paper introduces a method to estimate and bound fairness metrics in AI systems using incomplete, separate datasets, addressing privacy and access constraints in real-world fairness testing.
Contribution
It proposes a novel approach to leverage partial data sources to estimate joint distributions and fairness metrics, enabling fairness assessment without complete data.
Findings
Bounds on fairness metrics can be effectively derived from separate datasets.
The method provides reliable estimates of true fairness metrics in practical scenarios.
Experiments demonstrate the approach's applicability to real-world fairness testing.
Abstract
Ensuring fairness in AI systems is critical, especially in high-stakes domains such as lending, hiring, and healthcare. This urgency is reflected in emerging global regulations that mandate fairness assessments and independent bias audits. However, procuring the necessary complete data for fairness testing remains a significant challenge. In industry settings, legal and privacy concerns restrict the collection of demographic data required to assess group disparities, and auditors face practical and cultural challenges in gaining access to data. In practice, data relevant for fairness testing is often split across separate sources: internal datasets held by institutions with predictive attributes, and external public datasets such as census data containing protected attributes, each providing only partial, marginal information. Our work seeks to leverage such available separate data to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
