Prescriptive Zero Trust- Assessing the impact of zero trust on cyber attack prevention
Samuel Aiello

TL;DR
This paper introduces a data-driven, prescriptive methodology to quantify cybersecurity maturity through Zero Trust Architecture, emphasizing technical controls and a four-tier model to enhance cyber attack prevention.
Contribution
It presents a novel, quantifiable framework for assessing ZTA implementation maturity and its impact on cyber resilience, integrating key technical controls and industry best practices.
Findings
Defined a set of key technical controls for ZTA deployment
Developed a four-tier ZTA maturity model
Demonstrated improved attack prevention with higher ZTA maturity levels
Abstract
Increasingly sophisticated and varied cyber threats necessitate ever improving enterprise security postures. For many organizations today, those postures have a foundation in the Zero Trust Architecture. This strategy sees trust as something an enterprise must not give lightly or assume too broadly. Understanding the ZTA and its numerous controls centered around the idea of not trusting anything inside or outside the network without verification, will allow organizations to comprehend and leverage this increasingly common paradigm. The ZTA, unlike many other regulatory frameworks, is not tightly defined. The research assesses the likelihood of quantifiable guidelines that measure cybersecurity maturity for an enterprise organization in relation to ZTA implementation. This is a new, data driven methodology for quantifying cyber resilience enabled by the adoption of Zero Trust principles…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsInformation and Cyber Security · Network Security and Intrusion Detection · Smart Grid Security and Resilience
