Revisiting $d$-distance (independent) domination in trees and in bipartite graphs
Csilla Bujt\'as, Vesna Ir\v{s}i\v{c} Chenoweth, Sandi Klav\v{z}ar, Gang Zhang

TL;DR
This paper extends the understanding of $d$-distance domination in trees and bipartite graphs, proving new bounds, characterizing extremal cases, and generalizing previous conjectures and theorems.
Contribution
It proves that the $d$-distance $1$-packing domination number bound holds for bipartite graphs, characterizes extremal trees, and extends Favaron's theorem with new bounds based on leaves.
Findings
Bound $rac{n}{d+1}$ for bipartite graphs.
Characterization of trees where $rac{n}{d+1}$ bound is tight.
Extended bounds involving the number of leaves in trees.
Abstract
The -distance -packing domination number of is the minimum size of a set of vertices of which is both a -distance dominating set and a -packing. In 1994, Beineke and Henning conjectured that if and is a tree of order , then . They supported the conjecture by proving it for . In this paper, it is proved that holds for any bipartite graph of order , and any . Trees for which holds are characterized. It is also proved that if has leaves, then (provided that ), and (provided that ). The latter result extends Favaron's theorem from 1992 asserting that $\gamma_1^1(T) \leq…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
