Deploying Models to Non-participating Clients in Federated Learning without Fine-tuning: A Hypernetwork-based Approach
Yuhao Zhou, Jindi Lv, Yuxin Tian, Dan Si, Qing Ye, Jiancheng Lv

TL;DR
HyperFedZero introduces a hypernetwork-based method to generate personalized models for non-participating federated clients, effectively handling data heterogeneity without fine-tuning, and demonstrating superior performance with low overhead.
Contribution
The paper proposes HyperFedZero, a novel hypernetwork approach that dynamically generates client-specific models based on distribution-aware embeddings, addressing non-participating client adaptation in federated learning.
Findings
Outperforms existing methods across multiple datasets and models.
Maintains low computational, storage, and communication overhead.
Ablation studies confirm the importance of each component.
Abstract
Federated Learning (FL) has emerged as a promising paradigm for privacy-preserving collaborative learning, yet data heterogeneity remains a critical challenge. While existing methods achieve progress in addressing data heterogeneity for participating clients, they fail to generalize to non-participating clients with in-domain distribution shifts and resource constraints. To mitigate this issue, we present HyperFedZero, a novel method that dynamically generates specialized models via a hypernetwork conditioned on distribution-aware embeddings. Our approach explicitly incorporates distribution-aware inductive biases into the model's forward pass, extracting robust distribution embeddings using a NoisyEmbed-enhanced extractor with a Balancing Penalty, effectively preventing feature collapse. The hypernetwork then leverages these embeddings to generate specialized models chunk-by-chunk for…
Peer Reviews
Decision·ICLR 2026 Poster
1. The motivation is clearly declared: the inability to handle non-participating clients with distribution shifts. 2. Extensive experiments across 7 datasets and 5 models are conducted.
1. The technical description lacks sufficient detail for reproduction. 2. The method lacks theoretical justification. 3. How does the method scale with: a) Increasing number of clients? b) Larger model architectures? c) Higher-dimensional data?
1. Extensive experiments on a wide array of datasets
1. The setting of the article lacks authenticity. It seems that the author deliberately create a setting for this method. In the introduction part, the author mentions that such a scenario hinders further application in healthcare or edge computing. Can the author provide reference paper or a dataset to prove that such a problem does indeed exist among them? There is also no related work about this setting. 2. The writing of the paper needs improvement. In the Introduction, the author did not e
1)The paper is generally well written. The problem is well defined, and the methodology is well presented. 2)The ability of the proposed method to work without fine-tuning while still maintaining similar complexity as the baselines is practical and effective for the datasets and the settings presented. 3)The paper compares their method against several baselines, showing better results consistently, and also provides ablations for various design choices.
1)Although with the evaluated datasets and model architectures, the overall model size of HyperFedZero is comparable to FedAvg, it may not scale well with more complex models or datasets while still maintaining the performance. 2)The ablation study shows the method is sensitive to hyperparameters used, suggesting it may require extra careful tuning to get optimal results. 3)The paper mentions their method maintains privacy, but if the hypernetwork and distribution extractor are shared among th
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
