A Tale of Two Sightlines: Comparison of Hydrocarbon Dust Absorption Bands toward Cygnus OB2-12 and the Galactic Center
Yvonne J. Pendleton, T. R. Geballe, Laurie E. U. Chu, Marjorie Decleir, Karl D. Gordon, A. G. G. M. Tielens, Louis J. Allamandola, Jeroen Bouwman, J. E. Chiar, Curtis Dewitt, Burcu Gunay, Thomas Henning, Vito Mennella, M. E. Palumbo, Alexey Potapov, Maisie Rashman, Sascha Zeegers

TL;DR
This study compares hydrocarbon dust absorption features along two different interstellar sightlines, revealing that aromatic carbon dust is prevalent and likely consists of large aromatic cores with aliphatic mantles, primarily in the diffuse ISM.
Contribution
It provides a detailed comparison of hydrocarbon dust absorption bands toward Cygnus OB2-12 and the Galactic Center, highlighting the aromatic nature and composition of interstellar dust.
Findings
Strong similarities in absorption bands despite environmental differences
Carbonaceous dust is second in abundance after silicates in the ISM
Carriers of the aromatic and aliphatic bands are confined to the diffuse ISM
Abstract
Infrared spectra of hydrocarbon dust absorption bands toward the bright hypergiant Cygnus OB2-12 are compared to published spectra of the Quintuplet Cluster, a sightline to the Galactic center. The Cyg OB2-12 data include a new ground-based 2.86-3.70 microns spectrum and a previously published, but here further analyzed, spectrum of the 5.50-7.34 microns region. Higher spectral resolution data for the Cyg OB2-12 sightline in the 3 micron region allows a detailed comparison of the 3.4 micron aliphatic bands to those observed toward the Quintuplet. Despite differences in interstellar environments along each sightline, strong similarities are observed in the central wavelengths and relative strengths for bands at 3.3, 3.4, 5.85, 6.2, and 6.85 microns. Analysis of these bands, produced by aromatic, aliphatic, olefinic, hydrogenated, and oxygenated components, shows that carbonaceous dust is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
