Cyber Risks to Next-Gen Brain-Computer Interfaces: Analysis and Recommendations
Tyler Schroder, Renee Sirbu, Sohee Park, Jessica Morley, Sam Street, Luciano Floridi

TL;DR
This paper analyzes cybersecurity risks in next-generation brain-computer interfaces (BCIs), offering recommendations for manufacturers and regulators to enhance device security and protect patient data and safety.
Contribution
It provides a detailed threat model for BCI cybersecurity and proposes specific security measures for device manufacturers and regulatory guidance.
Findings
BCIs are more vulnerable to remote cyber-attacks than physical attacks.
Recommendations include encryption, strong authentication, and limited network connectivity.
A hypothetical threat model identifies key cybersecurity risks for BCI users.
Abstract
Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) show enormous potential for advancing personalized medicine. However, BCIs also introduce new avenues for cyber-attacks or security compromises. In this article, we analyze the problem and make recommendations for device manufacturers to better secure devices and to help regulators understand where more guidance is needed to protect patient safety and data confidentiality. Device manufacturers should implement the prior suggestions in their BCI products. These recommendations help protect BCI users from undue risks, including compromised personal health and genetic information, unintended BCI-mediated movement, and many other cybersecurity breaches. Regulators should mandate non-surgical device update methods, strong authentication and authorization schemes for BCI software modifications, encryption of data moving to and from the brain, and minimize…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
