Group Therapy for Halos: Advancing Halo Mass Estimation for Galaxy Groups
Welsey Van Kempen, Michelle E. Cluver, Edward N. Taylor, Darren J. Croton, Trystan S. Lambert, Claudia del P. Lagos

TL;DR
This paper calibrates and evaluates two methods for estimating galaxy group halo masses, improving accuracy and precision for cosmological and galaxy evolution studies using mock catalogues.
Contribution
It introduces calibrated dynamical and empirical halo mass estimators, assessing their accuracy, uncertainties, and model dependence with state-of-the-art simulations.
Findings
Virial theorem estimator has negligible bias and low scatter, insensitive to baryonic physics.
SHMR provides higher precision but is more model-dependent.
Guidelines for applying estimators to different survey types and redshift ranges.
Abstract
Accurate estimation of dark matter halo masses for galaxy groups is central to studies of galaxy evolution and for leveraging group catalogues as cosmological probes. We present a calibration and evaluation of two complementary halo mass estimators: a dynamical estimator based on the virial theorem, and an empirical relation between the sum of the stellar masses of the three most massive group galaxies and the halo mass (SHMR). Using state-of-the-art semi-analytic models (SHARK, SAGE, and GAEA) to generate mock light-cone catalogues, we quantify the accuracy, uncertainty, and model dependence of each method. The calibrated virial theorem achieves negligible systematic bias (mean = -0.01 dex) and low scatter (mean = 0.20 dex) with no sensitivity to baryonic physics. The calibrated SHMR yields the highest precision (mean = 0.02 dex, mean = 0.14 dex) but…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
