Mitigating Hallucinations in Large Language Models via Causal Reasoning
Yuangang Li, Yiqing Shen, Yi Nian, Jiechao Gao, Ziyi Wang, Chenxiao Yu, Shawn Li, Jie Wang, Xiyang Hu, Yue Zhao

TL;DR
This paper introduces a supervised fine-tuning framework called CDCR-SFT that trains large language models to explicitly construct and reason over causal DAGs, significantly reducing hallucinations and improving reasoning accuracy.
Contribution
The paper presents a novel causal-DAG construction and reasoning framework for LLMs, enabling explicit causal modeling to mitigate hallucinations and enhance reasoning performance.
Findings
Achieved 95.33% accuracy on CLADDER, surpassing human performance.
Reduced hallucinations on HaluEval by 10%.
Improved causal reasoning capabilities across multiple tasks.
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) exhibit logically inconsistent hallucinations that appear coherent yet violate reasoning principles, with recent research suggesting an inverse relationship between causal reasoning capabilities and such hallucinations. However, existing reasoning approaches in LLMs, such as Chain-of-Thought (CoT) and its graph-based variants, operate at the linguistic token level rather than modeling the underlying causal relationships between variables, lacking the ability to represent conditional independencies or satisfy causal identification assumptions. To bridge this gap, we introduce causal-DAG construction and reasoning (CDCR-SFT), a supervised fine-tuning framework that trains LLMs to explicitly construct variable-level directed acyclic graph (DAG) and then perform reasoning over it. Moreover, we present a dataset comprising 25,368 samples (CausalDR), where each…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
Taxonomy
TopicsMachine Learning in Healthcare
