Fast, Slow, and Tool-augmented Thinking for LLMs: A Review
Xinda Jia, Jinpeng Li, Zezhong Wang, Jingjing Li, Xingshan Zeng, Yasheng Wang, Weinan Zhang, Yong Yu, Weiwen Liu

TL;DR
This paper reviews various reasoning strategies in Large Language Models, proposing a taxonomy based on speed and tool use, and surveys recent methods to enhance adaptive reasoning capabilities.
Contribution
It introduces a novel taxonomy of LLM reasoning strategies along two boundaries and systematically categorizes recent adaptive reasoning methods in LLMs.
Findings
Identification of fast/slow and internal/external reasoning boundaries
Survey of recent adaptive reasoning techniques in LLMs
Highlighting open challenges and future research directions
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable progress in reasoning across diverse domains. However, effective reasoning in real-world tasks requires adapting the reasoning strategy to the demands of the problem, ranging from fast, intuitive responses to deliberate, step-by-step reasoning and tool-augmented thinking. Drawing inspiration from cognitive psychology, we propose a novel taxonomy of LLM reasoning strategies along two knowledge boundaries: a fast/slow boundary separating intuitive from deliberative processes, and an internal/external boundary distinguishing reasoning grounded in the model's parameters from reasoning augmented by external tools. We systematically survey recent work on adaptive reasoning in LLMs and categorize methods based on key decision factors. We conclude by highlighting open challenges and future directions toward more adaptive, efficient, and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBiomedical and Engineering Education · Open Education and E-Learning
