Learning Wisdom from Errors: Promoting LLM's Continual Relation Learning through Exploiting Error Cases
Shaozhe Yin, Jinyu Guo, Kai Shuang, Xia Liu, Ruize Ou

TL;DR
This paper introduces an instruction-based contrastive tuning method for Large Language Models to improve continual relation extraction by focusing on error cases, leading to state-of-the-art results.
Contribution
It proposes a novel dual-task fine-tuning and instruction-based contrastive strategy that leverages error cases to enhance LLMs' continual relation learning.
Findings
Achieves new state-of-the-art performance on TACRED and FewRel datasets.
Significantly improves relation extraction accuracy by exploiting error cases.
Demonstrates the effectiveness of error-focused training in continual learning for LLMs.
Abstract
Continual Relation Extraction (CRE) aims to continually learn new emerging relations while avoiding catastrophic forgetting. Existing CRE methods mainly use memory replay and contrastive learning to mitigate catastrophic forgetting. However, these methods do not attach importance to the error cases that can reveal the model's cognitive biases more effectively. To address this issue, we propose an instruction-based continual contrastive tuning approach for Large Language Models (LLMs) in CRE. Different from existing CRE methods that typically handle the training and memory data in a unified manner, this approach splits the training and memory data of each task into two parts respectively based on the correctness of the initial responses and treats them differently through dual-task fine-tuning. In addition, leveraging the advantages of LLM's instruction-following ability, we propose a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLegal Education and Practice Innovations · Artificial Intelligence in Law · Legal Systems and Judicial Processes
