CORE: Measuring Multi-Agent LLM Interaction Quality under Game-Theoretic Pressures
Punya Syon Pandey, Yongjin Yang, Jiarui Liu, Zhijing Jin

TL;DR
This paper introduces CORE, a new metric for evaluating the quality of multi-agent LLM interactions across different game-theoretic settings, revealing how social incentives influence language use and diversity.
Contribution
The paper presents CORE, a novel, comprehensive metric that quantifies dialog quality in multi-agent LLM interactions, incorporating linguistic diversity and semantic coherence.
Findings
Cooperative interactions show higher vocabulary growth and more repetition.
Competitive interactions exhibit less vocabulary expansion and lower repetition.
CORE effectively measures linguistic robustness across various social settings.
Abstract
Game-theoretic interactions between agents with Large Language Models (LLMs) have revealed many emergent capabilities, yet the linguistic diversity of these interactions has not been sufficiently quantified. In this paper, we present the Conversational Robustness Evaluation Score: CORE, a metric to quantify the effectiveness of language use within multi-agent systems across different game-theoretic interactions. CORE integrates measures of cluster entropy, lexical repetition, and semantic similarity, providing a direct lens of dialog quality. We apply CORE to pairwise LLM dialogs across competitive, cooperative, and neutral settings, further grounding our analysis in Zipf's and Heaps' Laws to characterize word frequency distributions and vocabulary growth. Our findings show that cooperative settings exhibit both steeper Zipf distributions and higher Heap exponents, indicating more…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
Taxonomy
TopicsMulti-Agent Systems and Negotiation · Auction Theory and Applications · Digital Rights Management and Security
