NP-Completeness Proofs of Puzzles using the T-Metacell Framework
Nattapol Kiatchaipipat, Suthee Ruangwises

TL;DR
This paper uses the T-metacell framework to prove NP-completeness of four pencil puzzles, revealing their computational difficulty and extending the framework's applicability to diverse puzzle constraints.
Contribution
It introduces NP-completeness proofs for four new pencil puzzles using the T-metacell framework, also establishing three as ASP-complete.
Findings
Four puzzles are NP-complete.
Grand Tour, Entry Exit, Zahlenschlange are ASP-complete.
Framework demonstrates versatility across puzzle types.
Abstract
Pencil puzzles are puzzles that can be solved by writing down solutions on a paper, using only logical reasoning. In this paper, we utilize the "T-metacell" framework developed by Tang and the MIT Hardness Group to prove the NP-completeness of four new pencil puzzles: Grand Tour, Entry Exit, Zahlenschlange, and Yagit. Additionally, the first three are also proven to be ASP-complete. The results demonstrate how versatile the framework is, offering new insights into the computational complexity of problems with various constraints.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Materials and Mechanics · Optimization and Packing Problems · Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation
