TL;DR
This paper introduces an interactive multi-agent framework for mental health assessment that simulates clinical dialogues, employs adaptive questioning, and uses dynamic memory to improve information extraction and diagnostic accuracy.
Contribution
It presents a novel multi-agent system with adaptive questioning and tree-structured memory for more effective and explainable mental health evaluation.
Findings
Outperforms existing methods on DAIC-WOZ dataset
Enhances information extraction through dynamic memory updates
Improves diagnostic accuracy with adaptive questioning
Abstract
Mental health assessment is crucial for early intervention and effective treatment, yet traditional clinician-based approaches are limited by the shortage of qualified professionals. Recent advances in artificial intelligence have sparked growing interest in automated psychological assessment, yet most existing approaches are constrained by their reliance on static text analysis, limiting their ability to capture deeper and more informative insights that emerge through dynamic interaction and iterative questioning. Therefore, in this paper, we propose a multi-agent framework for mental health evaluation that simulates clinical doctor-patient dialogues, with specialized agents assigned to questioning, adequacy evaluation, scoring, and updating. We introduce an adaptive questioning mechanism in which an evaluation agent assesses the adequacy of user responses to determine the necessity of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
