Simulation-based inference using splitting schemes for partially observed diffusions in chemical reaction networks
Petar Jovanovski, Andrew Golightly, Umberto Picchini, and Massimiliano Tamborrino

TL;DR
This paper introduces a novel simulation and inference method for chemical reaction networks modeled by SDEs, using splitting schemes that preserve model structure and enable efficient Bayesian inference with incomplete and noisy data.
Contribution
The authors develop a splitting scheme for Cox-Ingersoll-Ross-type SDEs and a sequential Monte Carlo Bayesian inference algorithm for partially observed systems, improving accuracy and efficiency.
Findings
The splitting scheme preserves key model properties and is robust for large time steps.
The inference algorithm effectively handles incomplete and noisy data.
Validated on chemical reaction models, showing improved accuracy and reduced computational cost.
Abstract
We address the problem of simulation and parameter inference for chemical reaction networks described by the chemical Langevin equation, a stochastic differential equation (SDE) representation of the dynamics of the chemical species. This is challenging for two main reasons. First, the (multi-dimensional) SDEs cannot be explicitly solved and are driven by multiplicative and non-commutative noise, requiring the development of advanced numerical schemes for their approximation and simulation. Second, not all components of the SDEs are directly observed, as the available discrete-time data are typically incomplete and/or perturbed with measurement error. We tackle these issues via three contributions. First, we show that these models can be rewritten as perturbed conditionally Cox-Ingersoll-Ross-type SDEs, i.e., each coordinate, conditioned on all other coordinates being fixed, follows an…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
