Grounding Rule-Based Argumentation Using Datalog
Martin Diller, Sarah Alice Gaggl, Philipp Hanisch, Giuseppina Monterosso, Fritz Rauschenbach

TL;DR
This paper introduces a novel grounding method for rule-based argumentation in ASPIC+ by translating first-order rules into Datalog, enabling scalable reasoning while maintaining correctness.
Contribution
It proposes an intelligent grounding procedure that translates ASPIC+ instances into Datalog and simplifies grounding, addressing exponential growth issues in rule-based argumentation.
Findings
The method effectively reduces grounding size.
Empirical results demonstrate scalability.
Correctness of reasoning is preserved.
Abstract
ASPIC+ is one of the main general frameworks for rule-based argumentation for AI. Although first-order rules are commonly used in ASPIC+ examples, most existing approaches to reason over rule-based argumentation only support propositional rules. To enable reasoning over first-order instances, a preliminary grounding step is required. As groundings can lead to an exponential increase in the size of the input theories, intelligent procedures are needed. However, there is a lack of dedicated solutions for ASPIC+. Therefore, we propose an intelligent grounding procedure that keeps the size of the grounding manageable while preserving the correctness of the reasoning process. To this end, we translate the first-order ASPIC+ instance into a Datalog program and query a Datalog engine to obtain ground substitutions to perform the grounding of rules and contraries. Additionally, we propose…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
