When Experts Disagree: Characterizing Annotator Variability for Vessel Segmentation in DSA Images
M. Geshvadi, G. So, D.D. Chlorogiannis, C. Galvin, E. Torio, A. Azimi, Y. Tachie-Baffour, N. Haouchine, A. Golby, M. Vangel, W.M. Wells, Y. Epelboym, R. Du, F. Durupinar, S. Frisken

TL;DR
This paper investigates the variability among expert annotations of cranial vessel segmentations in DSA images to quantify uncertainty and inform improved annotation strategies and automatic segmentation methods.
Contribution
It introduces a method to analyze and quantify segmentation uncertainty due to annotator variability in vessel segmentation tasks.
Findings
Quantified segmentation uncertainty among multiple annotators.
Discussed how uncertainty can guide additional annotations.
Proposed approaches for uncertainty-aware automatic segmentation.
Abstract
We analyze the variability among segmentations of cranial blood vessels in 2D DSA performed by multiple annotators in order to characterize and quantify segmentation uncertainty. We use this analysis to quantify segmentation uncertainty and discuss ways it can be used to guide additional annotations and to develop uncertainty-aware automatic segmentation methods.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
