A Two-Step Test to Identify Zero-Inflated Biomarkers in Early-Phase Clinical Trials
Nan Miles Xi, Lin Wang

TL;DR
This paper introduces a two-step statistical test for detecting predictive biomarkers in early-phase clinical trials, especially effective with zero-inflated biomarker data, improving power over existing methods while maintaining error control.
Contribution
The paper proposes a novel two-step testing procedure that isolates biomarker-negative and positive effects, enhancing detection power in zero-inflated biomarker distributions.
Findings
The method maintains nominal type I error across various zero-inflation rates.
It shows improved power over AKSA in simulations with skewed distributions.
The approach is flexible for different biomarker effect scenarios.
Abstract
In early-phase clinical trials, a predictive biomarker may identify subgroups that benefit from an experimental therapy, even when the overall average treatment effect is negligible. Recently proposed nonparametric interaction tests such as the Average Kolmogorov-Smirnov Approach (AKSA) avoid prespecified biomarker cutting points and model assumptions, but their power degrades when the biomarker distribution is zero-inflated. We propose a two-step test that partitions the analysis into a spike test for biomarker-negative patients and a tail test for biomarker-positive patients, then combines the resulting p-values using Fisher's or Brown's method. This design isolates distinct sources of predictive effects, mitigates dilution, and preserves exact type I error control through permutation calibration. We derive theoretical properties showing that the proposed test retains nominal size and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
