EgoCross: Benchmarking Multimodal Large Language Models for Cross-Domain Egocentric Video Question Answering
Yanjun Li, Yuqian Fu, Tianwen Qian, Qi'ao Xu, Silong Dai, Danda Pani Paudel, Luc Van Gool, and Xiaoling Wang

TL;DR
EgoCross is a new benchmark designed to evaluate how well multimodal large language models can generalize across diverse real-world egocentric video domains like surgery, sports, and animals, revealing current models' limitations.
Contribution
The paper introduces EgoCross, a comprehensive cross-domain benchmark for egocentric video question answering, covering four challenging domains and providing a platform for evaluating and improving model generalization.
Findings
Most existing MLLMs struggle to generalize beyond daily activities.
Fine-tuning and reinforcement learning show potential for improvement.
EgoCross highlights significant gaps in current model robustness.
Abstract
Recent advances in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have significantly pushed the frontier of egocentric video question answering (EgocentricQA). However, existing benchmarks and studies are mainly limited to common daily activities such as cooking and cleaning. In contrast, real-world deployment inevitably encounters domain shifts, where target domains differ substantially in both visual style and semantic content. To bridge this gap, we introduce \textbf{EgoCross}, a comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate the cross-domain generalization of MLLMs in EgocentricQA. EgoCross covers four diverse and challenging domains, including surgery, industry, extreme sports, and animal perspective, representing realistic and high-impact application scenarios. It comprises approximately 1,000 QA pairs across 798 video clips, spanning four key QA tasks: prediction, recognition,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
