A Structured Framework for Prioritizing Unsafe Control Actions in STPA: Case Study on eVTOL Operations
Halima El Badaoui

TL;DR
This paper presents a structured, objective framework combining expert input and Monte Carlo simulation to prioritize unsafe control actions in complex systems, demonstrated through an eVTOL safety case study.
Contribution
It introduces a novel prioritization approach for UCAs that integrates severity, impact factors, expert rankings, and Monte Carlo simulation for objectivity.
Findings
Identified 318 UCAs in the eVTOL project.
110 UCAs were classified as high-priority for safety improvements.
The framework improved clarity and objectivity in prioritizing safety actions.
Abstract
Systems Theoretic Process Analysis (STPA) is a widely recommended method for analysing complex system safety. STPA can identify numerous Unsafe Control Actions (UCAs) and requirements depending on the level of granularity of the analysis and the complexity of the system being analysed. Managing numerous results is challenging, especially during a fast-paced development lifecycle. Extensive research has been done to optimize the efficiency of managing and prioritising the STPA results. However, maintaining the objectivity of prioritisation and communicating the prioritised results have become common challenges. In this paper, the authors present a complementary approach that incorporates inputs from both the safety analysts and domain experts to more objectively prioritise UCAs. This is done by evaluating the severity of each UCA, the impact factor of each controller or decision maker…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
