Cosmic cascades: How disk substructure regulates the flow of water to inner planetary systems
Sebastiaan Krijt, Andrea Banzatti, Ke Zhang, Paola Pinilla, Till Kaeufer, Edwin A. Bergin, Colette Salyk, Klaus Pontoppidan, Geoffrey A. Blake, Feng Long, Jane Huang, Mar\'ia Jos\'e Colmenares, Joe Williams, Adrien Houge, Mayank Narang, Miguel Vioque, Michiel Lambrechts

TL;DR
This study links disk substructure, specifically gaps, to water vapor and pebble flux near the snowline in protoplanetary disks, using JWST and ALMA data to test models of planet formation.
Contribution
It provides observational evidence connecting disk gaps with pebble flux and water vapor, supporting models of inner-outer disk interactions in planet formation.
Findings
Water line flux ratio correlates with innermost dust gap location.
Early and effective gaps match observed pebble drift trends.
Pebble fluxes are comparable to those in Solar System formation models.
Abstract
The influx of icy pebbles to the inner regions of protoplanetary disks constitutes a fundamental ingredient in most planet formation theories. The observational determination of the magnitude of this pebble flux and its dependence on disk substructure (disk gaps as pebble traps) would be a significant step forward. In this work we analyze a sample of 21 T Tauri disks (with ages ) using JWST/MIRI spectra homogeneously reduced with the JDISCS pipeline and high-angular-resolution ALMA continuum data. We find that the 1500/6000 K water line flux ratio measured with JWST - a tracer of cold water vapor and pebble drift near the snowline - correlates with the radial location of the innermost dust gap in ALMA continuum observations (ranging from 8.7 to 69 au), confirming predictions from recent models that study connections between the inner and outer disk…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
