SSBE-PINN: A Sobolev Boundary Scheme Boosting Stability and Accuracy in Elliptic/Parabolic PDE Learning
Qixuan Zhou, Chuqi Chen, Tao Luo, Yang Xiang

TL;DR
This paper introduces SSBE-PINN, a Sobolev boundary scheme that enhances the stability and accuracy of physics-informed neural networks in solving elliptic and parabolic PDEs by incorporating boundary regularity through Sobolev norms.
Contribution
The paper proposes a novel Sobolev-Stable Boundary Enforcement method that improves boundary treatment in PINNs, providing theoretical stability guarantees and demonstrating superior numerical performance.
Findings
SSBE-PINN achieves lower H1 and L2 errors compared to standard PINNs.
The method maintains stability and accuracy in high-dimensional PDE problems.
Numerical experiments validate the theoretical stability and robustness of SSBE-PINN.
Abstract
Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) have emerged as a powerful framework for solving partial differential equations (PDEs), yet they often fail to achieve accurate convergence in the H1 norm, especially in the presence of boundary approximation errors. In this work, we propose a novel method called Sobolev-Stable Boundary Enforcement (SSBE), which redefines the boundary loss using Sobolev norms to incorporate boundary regularity directly into the training process. We provide rigorous theoretical analysis demonstrating that SSBE ensures bounded H1 error via a stability guarantee and derive generalization bounds that characterize its robustness under finite-sample regimes. Extensive numerical experiments on linear and nonlinear PDEs, including Poisson, heat, and elliptic problems, show that SSBE consistently outperforms standard PINNs in terms of both relative L2 and H1 errors, even…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
