Why Cannot Large Language Models Ever Make True Correct Reasoning?
Jingde Cheng

TL;DR
This paper argues that large language models cannot achieve true correct reasoning due to fundamental limitations in their working principles, challenging claims of their reasoning abilities.
Contribution
It provides a critical analysis explaining why LLMs are inherently incapable of true reasoning, clarifying misconceptions in current AI discourse.
Findings
LLMs lack genuine reasoning capabilities
Theoretical limitations prevent true reasoning in LLMs
Current reasoning claims are illusions
Abstract
Recently, with the application progress of AIGC tools based on large language models (LLMs), led by ChatGPT, many AI experts and more non-professionals are trumpeting the "reasoning ability" of the LLMs. The present author considers that the so-called "reasoning ability" of LLMs are just illusions of those people who with vague concepts. In fact, the LLMs can never have the true reasoning ability. This paper intents to explain that, because the essential limitations of their working principle, the LLMs can never have the ability of true correct reasoning.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNatural Language Processing Techniques · Topic Modeling
