The Challenge of Computing Geode Numbers
Tewodros Amdeberhan, Manuel Kauers, and Doron Zeilberger

TL;DR
This paper explores the computational challenges of Geode numbers, a new combinatorial sequence, highlighting their complexity in higher dimensions and the difficulty of calculating large terms.
Contribution
It introduces the problem of computing Geode numbers in multiple dimensions and discusses the computational methods and challenges involved.
Findings
Closed-form expression for 2D case
Significant computational difficulty in 3D and higher
Inability to compute large terms like the 1000th in 4D
Abstract
In a fascinating recent American Mathematical Monthly article, Norman Wildberger and Dean Rubine introduced a new kind of combinatorial numbers, that they aptly named the ``Geode numbers''. While their definition is simple, these numbers are surprisingly hard to compute, in general. While the two-dimensional case has a nice closed-form expression, that make them easy to compute, already the three-dimensional case poses major computational challenges that we do meet, combining experimental mathematics and the holonomic ansatz. Alas, things get really complicated in four and higher dimensions, and we are unable to efficiently compute, for example, the -th term of the four-dimensional diagonal Geode sequence. A donation of US dollars to the OEIS, in honor of the first person to compute this number, is offered.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
