$c_\text{eff}$ from Surgery and Modularity
Shimal Harichurn, Mrunmay Jagadale, Dmitry Noshchenko, Davide Passaro

TL;DR
This paper compares two proposals for extending $ ext{Z}$ invariants to all 3-manifolds, using the effective central charge to reveal inconsistencies and sensitivities in the theory.
Contribution
It introduces a detailed analysis of the effective central charge for different prescriptions, highlighting their incompatibility and the sensitivity of $ ext{Z}$ invariants to manifold orientation.
Findings
The upper bound on $c_{ ext{eff}}$ is governed by the Ramanujan theta function.
Numerical and modular tools provide exact $c_{ ext{eff}}$ values via mock-modular analysis.
Some prescriptions violate expected relations between $c_{ ext{eff}}$, Chern-Simons invariants, and flat connections.
Abstract
invariants, rigorously defined for negative definite plumbed 3-manifolds, are expected--on physical grounds--to exist for every closed, oriented 3-manifold. Several prescriptions have been proposed to extend their definition to generic plumbings by reversing the orientation of a negative definite plumbing, thus turning it into a positive definite one. Two existing proposals are relevant for this paper: (i) the regularized -surgery conjecture combined with the false-mock modular conjecture, and (ii) a construction based on resurgence and a false theta function duality. In this note, we compare these proposals on the class of Brieskorn homology spheres and find that they are incompatible in general. Our diagnostic is the effective central charge, , which governs the asymptotic growth of coefficients of .…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
