Unifying equivalences across unsupervised learning, network science, and imaging/network neuroscience
Mika Rubinov

TL;DR
This paper unifies diverse analytical methods across unsupervised learning, network science, and neuroscience, providing a framework that simplifies interpretation and integration of complex datasets and models.
Contribution
It introduces equivalences that connect different analyses and models across these fields, facilitating scientific integration and reducing redundancy.
Findings
Unified objectives across clustering and dimensionality reduction methods.
Equated connectional measures with communication and control metrics.
Provided a toolbox for applying these unified analyses to brain imaging data.
Abstract
Modern scientific fields face the challenge of integrating a wealth of data, analyses, and results. We recently showed that a neglect of this integration can lead to circular analyses and redundant explanations. Here, we help advance scientific integration by describing equivalences that unify diverse analyses of datasets and networks. We describe equivalences across analyses of clustering and dimensionality reduction, network centrality and dynamics, and popular models in imaging and network neuroscience. First, we equate foundational objectives across unsupervised learning and network science (from k means to modularity to UMAP), fuse classic algorithms for optimizing these objectives, and extend these objectives to simplify interpretations of popular dimensionality reduction methods. Second, we equate basic measures of connectional magnitude and dispersion with six measures of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
