A Bayesian factor analysis model for non-randomised staggered designs
Constantin Schmidt, Shaun R. Seaman, Beatrice Emmanouil, Leila Reid, Stuart Smith, Daniela De Angelis, Pantelis Samartsidis

TL;DR
This paper introduces a Bayesian causal factor analysis model for count data with ordinal interventions, enabling uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis, applied to evaluate the impact of peer supporters on hepatitis C case-finding.
Contribution
It develops a novel Bayesian model for causal inference in non-randomized, staggered designs with count outcomes, incorporating joint modeling and sensitivity analysis for individual treatment effects.
Findings
Peers increased HCV case-finding.
Intervention effect grew with intensity.
Stronger effects observed during COVID-19 lockdown.
Abstract
The employment of peer supporter workers starting in 2018 was one of the interventions deployed by National Health Service England as part of its Hepatitis C virus (HCV) elimination plan. Peers are individuals with relevant lived experience who educate their communities about the virus and promote testing and treatment. In this paper, we assess the causal effect of the peers intervention on HCV patient case-finding, using data on 22 administrative regions from January 2016 to May 2021. To do this, we develop a Bayesian causal factor analysis model for count outcomes and ordinal interventions. Our method provides uncertainty quantification for all causal estimands of interest, gains efficiency by jointly modelling the intervention assignment process, pre- and post-intervention outcomes, and provides estimates of both conditional average and individual treatment effects (ITEs). For ITEs,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
