Measurement of Parity-Violating Modes of the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) Year 1 Luminous Red Galaxies' 4-Point Correlation Function
Zachary Slepian, Alex Krolewski, Alessandro Greco, Simon May, William Ortola Leonard, Farshad Kamalinejad, Jessica Chellino, Matthew Reinhard, Elena Fernandez, Francisco Prada, Steven Ahlen, Davide Bianchi, David Brooks, Todd Claybaugh, Axel de la Macorra, Arnaud de Mattia

TL;DR
This paper presents the first measurement of the parity-violating 4-point correlation function in galaxy data, finding a significant auto-correlation signal but no corresponding cross-correlation, raising questions about the origin of the PV signal.
Contribution
It introduces the first measurement of the PV 4PCF in DESI Year 1 LRG data and compares auto and cross analyses, revealing a significant auto signal without a corresponding cross detection.
Findings
Significant auto PV 4PCF signal detected at 4-10σ
No PV signal detected in cross-correlation analysis
Discrepancy between auto and cross measurements raises questions
Abstract
Here we report the first measurement of the parity-violating (PV) 4-Point Correlation Function (4PCF) of the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument's Year 1 Luminous Red Galaxy (DESI Y1 LRG) sample, motivated by the potential detection of the PV 4PCF in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (SDSS BOSS) galaxies. In our auto-correlation ("auto") analysis, we find a statistically significant excess of the PV signal compared to mocks without any PV, at 4-10 depending on details of the analysis. This could arise either from genuine PV or from an underestimation of the variance in the mocks; it is unlikely to arise, at the signal level, from a systematic. We then cross-correlate ("cross") the putative PV signal between different, independent patches of sky, and there find no detection of parity violation. The two measurements are in significant tension:…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
