GRB minimum variability timescales with Fermi/GBM

TL;DR

This study calculates the minimum variability timescale (MVT) for around 3700 GRBs using Fermi/GBM data, revealing insights into their classification, progenitors, and correlations with other properties, and comparing different MVT definitions.

Contribution

It provides a comprehensive MVT analysis for a large GRB sample, compares methods, and explores implications for GRB classification and progenitor identification.

Findings

SEE-GRBs and SGRBs have similar MVTs, suggesting a common progenitor.

Extragalactic magnetar giant flares have shorter MVTs than typical GRBs.

The new MVT measurement method yields higher values than previous techniques.

Abstract

Context. Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) have traditionally been classified by duration into long (LGRBs) and short (SGRBs), with the former believed to originate from massive star collapses and the latter from compact binary mergers. However, events such as the SGRB 200826A (coming from a collapsar) and the LGRBs 211211A and 230307A (associated with a merger) suggest that duration-based classification could be sometimes misleading. Recently, the minimum variability timescale (MVT) has emerged as a key metric for classifying GRBs. Aims. We calculate the MVT, defined as the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the narrowest pulse in the light curve, using an independent dataset from Fermi/GBM and we compare our results with other MVT definitions. We update the MVT-T90 plane and analyse peculiar events like long-duration merger candidates 211211A, 230307A, and other short GRBs with extended emission (SEE-GRBs). We also examine extragalactic magnetar giant flares (MGFs) and explore possible new correlations with peak energy. Methods. We used the MEPSA algorithm to identify the shortest pulse in each GRB light curve and measure its FWHM. We calculated the MVT for around 3700 GRBs, 177 of which with spectroscopically known redshift. Results. SEE-GRBs and SGRBs share similar MVTs (from few tens to a few hundreds of ms), indicating a common progenitor, while extragalactic MGFs exhibit even shorter values (from few ms to few tens of ms). Our MVT estimation method consistently yields higher values than another existing technique, the latter aligning with the pulse rise time. For LGRBs, we confirmed the correlations of MVT with peak luminosity and Lorentz factor. Conclusions. We confirmed that, although MVT alone cannot determine the GRB progenitor, it is a valuable tool when combined with other indicators, helping to flag long-duration mergers and distinguish MGFs from typical SGRBs.