Challenging a binary neutron star merger interpretation of GW230529
Ivan Markin, Anna Puecher, Mattia Bulla, Tim Dietrich

TL;DR
This paper challenges the initial neutron star-black hole merger interpretation of GW230529 by analyzing waveform degeneracies, simulations, and electromagnetic signatures, suggesting a possible binary neutron star origin instead.
Contribution
It provides a detailed comparison of neutron star-black hole and binary neutron star scenarios for GW230529 using simulations and waveform analysis, highlighting the ambiguity in the event's classification.
Findings
GW230529 is more likely a neutron star-black hole merger but cannot be confirmed.
Electromagnetic signatures are too dim for current surveys if only dynamical ejecta are considered.
Detectable electromagnetic counterparts could be observed by the Vera C. Rubin Observatory with additional disk wind ejecta.
Abstract
GW230529_181500 represented the first gravitational-wave detection with one of the component objects' mass inferred to lie in the previously hypothesized mass gap between the heaviest neutron stars and the lightest observed black holes. Given the expected maximum mass values for neutron stars, this object was identified as a black hole, and, with the secondary component being a neutron star, the detection was classified as a neutron star-black hole merger. However, due to the low signal-to-noise ratio and the known waveform degeneracy between the spin and mass ratio in the employed gravitational-wave models, GW230529_181500 could also be interpreted as a merger of two heavy () neutron stars with high spins. We investigate the distinguishability of these scenarios by performing parameter estimation on simulated signals obtained from numerical-relativity…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
