Dynamic Rank Adjustment for Accurate and Efficient Neural Network Training
Hyuntak Shin, Aecheon Jung, Sungeun Hong, Sunwoo Lee

TL;DR
This paper introduces a dynamic-rank training framework that alternates between full-rank and low-rank epochs to maintain model capacity and improve training efficiency, achieving accuracy comparable to full-rank training with similar computational costs.
Contribution
The authors propose a novel dynamic-rank training method that prevents rank collapse and enhances low-rank training effectiveness across diverse neural network tasks.
Findings
Maintains high accuracy comparable to full-rank training.
Achieves low-rank training with similar computational cost as SVD-based methods.
Effectively prevents rank decline during training.
Abstract
Low-rank training methods reduce the number of trainable parameters by re-parameterizing the weights with matrix decompositions (e.g., singular value decomposition). However, enforcing a fixed low-rank structure caps the rank of the weight matrices and can hinder the model's ability to learn complex patterns. Furthermore, the effective rank of the model's weights tends to decline during training, and this drop is accelerated when the model is reparameterized into a low-rank structure. In this study, we argue that strategically interleaving full-rank training epochs within low-rank training epochs can effectively restore the rank of the model's weights. Based on our findings, we propose a general dynamic-rank training framework that is readily applicable to a wide range of neural-network tasks. We first describe how to adjust the rank of weight matrix to alleviate the inevitable rank…
Peer Reviews
Decision·ICLR 2026 Conference Withdrawn Submission
1. The paper is well organized and the writing, figures, and algorithmic pseudocode are easy to follow. 2. Evaluations on diverse benchmarks are thorough and show consistent performance improvements with moderate computational overhead.
1. Limited Theoretical Depth. The theoretical analysis remains heuristic, and does not provide rigorous convergence guarantees or formal explanation on how the scheduling principle optimizes rank recovery. i) Proposition 1 provides a bound on the rank of the reconstructed matrix that is derived under an idealized assumption. The low-rank component is supposed to perfectly cancel the base weights, which may not reflect the complex, stochastic optimization dynamics in practice. ii) Similarly,
+ The proposed dynamic-rank training can somewhat increase the model capacity in the fine-tuning process while preserving higher performance. + This paper provides a theoretical analysis of the proposed dynamic-rank training. + The proposed method performs well on multiple datasets compared to existing low-ranking training approaches.
- Limited novelty. Although the paper adopts a dynamic-rank strategy, the approach essentially remains a variant of standard low-rank training. Dynamically adjusting the rank appears to be more of a training trick than a genuine research innovation. Moreover, the observation that higher ranks yield better performance is a well-known and intuitive fact rather than a novel insight. - Questionable practicality. The proposed method increases training cost due to periodic rank adjustments, which req
The paper is overall well-written and organized clearly. The investigated problem is very relevant in the contect of stable pretraining and fine-tuning.
1. I personally fail to see the point of Proposition 2: while it is true that the right-hand side increases as a function of the learning rate, the bound on $d_t$ given by $$ d_t \leq ||\nabla f(W_t)||_F(1+ O(\eta)) + O(\eta^2) \to ||\nabla f(W_t)||_F, \quad \eta \to 0 $$ Therefore, the tightest bound is obtained in the limit, but it simply says that the relative error $$ \frac{d_t}{||\nabla f(W_t) ||} \leq 1, $$ in the limit $\eta \to 0$. For this reason, the bound is fully vacuous, and theref
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques · Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques · Face and Expression Recognition
